FUNKCIONALNE ZAHTEVE ZA BIBLIOGRAFSKE ZAPISE (FZBZ): ANALIZA UPORABNOSTI KONCEPTUALNEGA MODELA BIBLIOGRAFSKEGA SVETA
Ključne besede:
funkcionalne zahteve za bibliografske zapise, bibliografski zapis, miselni modeli, konceptualni modeliPovzetek
IZVLEČEK
V članku sta predstavljeni dve študiji, povezani s konceptualnim modelom bibliografskega sveta Funkcionalne zahteve za bibliografske zapise (FZBZ). Model FZBZ je nastal na osnovi izkušenj strokovnjakov, ni pa preverjen v praksi. Prva študija je ekspertna primerjava dveh prototipov, zasnovanih na FZBZ, FictionFinder in LibraryLabs, ki je bila izvedena januarja 2007. Ta je pokazala, da FZBZ omogoča izboljšanje prikazov, vendar obstajajo težave pri identifikaciji entitet. Druga je raziskava miselnih modelov bibliografskega sveta, ki je prva objavljena tovrstna uporabniška študija. Sestavljena je bila iz treh nalog: razvrščanja, izdelave miselnih vzorcev ter primerjave in je bila izvedena na 30 udeležencih s področja Ljubljane v času med julijem 2007 ter februarjem 2008. Izkazalo se je, da ne obstaja le en miselni model bibliografskega sveta. Različni posamezniki imajo praviloma različne miselne modele bibliografskega sveta, ki se običajno ne skladajo popolnoma s konceptualnim modelom FZBZ. Izkazalo se je tudi, da se miselni modeli bibliografskega sveta pri posameznikih spreminjajo in so bolj podobni FZBZ, ko so posamezniki v interakciji z bibliografskim svetom. Kljub različnosti pa rezultati kažejo, da so v povprečju miselni modeli bibliografskega sveta podobni konceptualnemu modelu FZBZ.
Literatura
Ayres, M. (2005). Case Studies in Implementing Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records [FRBR]: AustLit and Music Australia. The Australian Library Journal. 54 (1), 43–54.
Borgman, C. (1985). The User’s Mental Model of an Information Retrieval System. V: SIGIR ’85: Proceedings of the 8th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval (str. 268–273).
Carlyle, A. (1999). User Categorisation of Works: Toward Improved Organisation of On-Line Catalogue Displays. Journal of Documentation, 55 (2), 184–208.
Carlyle, A. (2001). Developing Organized Displays for Voluminous Works: A Study of User Clustering Behaviour. Information Processing & Management, 35 (5), 677–699.
Carlyle, A. (2003). User Perspectives of Works. Pridobljeno 14. 1. 2009 s spletne strani http://dlist.sir.arizona.edu/archive/00000272/01/CarlyleWorksandUsers.pdf
Carlyle, A. (2006). Understanding FRBR as a Conceptual Model: FRBR and the Bibliographic Universe. Library Resources & Technical Services. 50 (4), 264–273.
Delsey, T. (2005). Modeling Subject Access Extending the FRBR and FRANAR Conceptual Models. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 39 (3/4), 49–62.
Fattahi R. (1997). The relevance of cataloguing principles to the online environment; an historical and analytical study. Doctoral thesis. Sidney: University of New
South Wales. Pridobljeno 5.3.2006 s spletne strani http://profsite.um.aci.ir/~fattahi/thesis1.htm
Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records: final report (1998). München: KG Saur.
Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records: final report (2009). Pridobljeno 9. 3. 2009 s spletne strani http://www.ifla.org/VII/s13/frbr/frbr_2008.pdf
Heaney, M. (1997) Time is of the essence. 11 August 1997. Pridobljeno 26. 11. 2008 s spletne strani http://www.bodley.ox.ac.uk/users/mh/time978a.htm.
Hickey, T. & O’Neill, E. (2005). FRBRizing OCLC’s WorldCat. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 39 (3/4), 239–251.
International Working Group on FRBR and CIDOC CRM Harmonisation (2008). FRBR object oriented definition and mapping to FRBRER (version 0.9 draft). Pridobljeno 20. 2. 2009 s spletne strani http://cidoc.ics.forth.gr/docs/frbr_
oo/frbr_docs/FRBR_oo_V0.9.pdf
Kilner, K. (2005). The AustLit Gateway and Scholarly Bibliography: A Specialist Implementation of the FRBR. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 39 (3/4), 87–102.
Le Boeuf, P. (2005). Musical Works in the FRBR Model or »Quasi la Stessa Cosa«: Variations on a Theme by Umberto Eco. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 39 (3/4), 1–14.
Leskovec, M. (2005). Delo, izrazna oblika, pojavna oblika: kaj uporabniki res iščejo?. Diplomsko delo. Ljubljana: Univerza v Ljubljani, Filozofska fakulteta.
Norman, D. (1998). The design of everyday things. London: MIT Press.
Rouse, W. & Morris, N. (1986). On Looking Into the Black Box: Prospects and Limits in the Search for Mental Models. Psychological Bulletin, 100 (3), 349–363.
Yee, M. (2005). FRBRization: A Method for Turning Online Public Finding Lists into Online Public Catalogs. Information Technology and Libraries, 24 (2), 77–95.
On the Record (2008). Pridobljeno 19. 1. 2009 s spletne strani http://www.loc.gov/bibliographic-future/news/lcwg-ontherecord-jan08-final.pdf.
Žumer, M. (2000), User interface on CD-ROM: results of a survey. Program, 34 (3), 281–290.
Prenosi
Objavljeno
Kako citirati
Številka
Rubrike
Licenca
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
