Izhodišča za proučevanje kakovosti podatkov v bibliografskih in normativnih zapisih: kakovost podatkov v kontekstu in raziskovalne usmeritve v katalogizaciji

Branka Badovinac

Izvleček


Izvleček
Namen: S prispevkom smo želeli opozoriti na nekatera izhodišča za proučevanje kakovosti podatkov v bibliografskih in normativnih zapisih. Specifično nas je zanimalo 1) razumevanje kakovosti podatkov v katalogizaciji, 2) teoretične osnove in pojmi o kakovosti podatkov ter 3) usmerjenost novejših raziskav o kakovosti podatkov s področja katalogizacije (vključujoč digitalne knjižnice).
Metodologija/pristop: Prva dela raziskave sta zasnovana eksplorativno, medtem ko smo se v študiji raziskovalnih usmeritev z metodo analize literature omejili na pomembnejše objave v letih 2003–2016.
Rezultati: Kakovost podatkov smo umestili v katalogizacijo tako, da smo poskusili opredeliti dejavnike, ki vplivajo na razumevanje kakovosti podatkov v katalogizaciji. V prispevku smo povzeli nekaj izhodišč z vidikov uporabnika, enotne obdelave, organizacije/racionalizacije delovnega procesa, katalogizatorjev ter tehnologije in programske opreme. Na podlagi drugega dela prispevka o teoretičnih osnovah o kakovosti podatkov smo nato raziskovalne usmeritve povzeli skozi prizmo opredeljevanja napak, dimenzij, uporabo mer in metod merjenja, vrednotenja in interpretacije ugotovitev, tehnike in aktivnosti pri odpravljanju napak. Rezultati so pokazali možnosti razširitve nabora dimenzij, ki opredeljujejo kakovost podatkov, ter nakazali problem ekspertnega vrednotenja in smer razvoja bolj sofisticiranih avtomatiziranih postopkov merjenja in odpravljanja napak.
Omejitve raziskave: Zaradi obsežnosti raziskovalnega vprašanja in slabše sistematičnosti pri izboru virov so nekateri vidiki premalo problematizirani.
Izvirnost/uporabnost raziskave: Študija zapolnjuje nekatere teoretične vrzeli pri preučevanju kakovosti podatkov v katalogizaciji.
Ključne besede: katalogizacija, kakovost podatkov, metapodatki, bibliografski zapisi, normativni zapisi


Full Text:

PDF

References


Aljumaili, M., Karim, R. in Tretten, P. (2016). Metadata-based data quality assessment. Vine, 46(2), 232−250.

Bade, D. (2008). The perfect bibliographic record: platonic ideal, rhetorical strategy or nonsense?. Cataloging and classification quarterly, 46(1), 109−133.

Batini, C. in Scannapieca, M. (2016). Data and information quality: dimensions, principles and techniques. Berlin: Springer.

Bianchini, C. in Guerrini, M. (2016). RDA: a content standard to ensure the quality of data. JLIS, 7(2). 83−98

Bibliotekarski terminološki slovar. (2009). Ljubljana: Zveza bibliotekarskih društev Slovenije.

Bruce, T. R. in Hillman, D. I. (2004). The continuum of metadata quality: defining, expressing, exploiting. V D. Hillmann in E. Westbrooks (ur.), Metadata in practice (str. 238−256). Chicago: American Library Association. Pridobljeno 12. 3. 2012 s spletne strani: http://www.ecommons.cornell.edu/handle/1813/7895

Calhoun, K., Cantrell, J., Gallagher, P. in Hawk, J. (2009). Online catalogs: what users and librarians want: an OCLC report. Dublin, Oh.: OCLC. Pridobljeno 12. 12. 2016 s spletne strani: http://www.oclc.org/us/en/reports/onlinecatalogs/fullreport.pdf

Chapman, A. in Massey, O. (2002). A catalogue quality audit tool. Library and information research news, 26(82), 26−37.

Colyle, K. (2010). Library data in the web world. Library technology reports, 46(2), 5−11.

Connaway, L. S. in Dickey, T. J. (2011). Publisher names in bibliographic data: an experimental authority file and a prototype application. Library resources and technical services, 55(4), 182−194.

Cossham, A. F. (2013). Bibliographic records in an online environment. Information research, 18(3), paper C42.

Cox, E. J. in Myers, A. K. D. (2010). What is a professional cataloger?: perception differences between professionals and paraprofessionals. Library resources and technical services, 54(4), 212−226.

Crnčić, M. (2010). Kakovost bibliografskih zapisov v vzajemnem katalogu COBIB. Diplomsko delo. Ljubljana: Filozofska fakulteta.

Danskin, A. (2006). What difference does it make? Measuring the quality of cataloguing and the catalogue. Catalogue and index, (154), 9−12.

Diao, J. in Hernadez, M. A. (2014). Transferring cataloging legacies into descriptive metadata creation in digital projects: catalogers’ perspective. Journal of library metadata, 14(2), 130−145.

Eklund, A. P., Miksa, S. D., Moen, W. E., Snyder, G. in Polyakov, S. (2009). Comparison of MARC content designation utilization in OCLC WorldCat records with national, core, and minimal level record standards. Journal of library metadata, 9(1–2), 36–64. doi: 10.1080/19386380903095073

El-Sherbini, M. (2010). Program for cooperative cataloging: BIBCO records: analysis of quality. Cataloging and classification quarterly, 48(2−3), 221−236.

Enci, T. (2011). Kakovost bibliografskih zapisov za serijske publikacije v vzajemnem katalogu COBIB.SI. Diplomsko delo. Ljubljana: Filozofska fakulteta.

Escolano Rodriguez, E. (2014). Consolidated edition of ISBD, International Standard Bibliographic Description: a standard to trust, a quality brand. Cataloging and classification quarterly, 52(8), 835−854.

Galway, L. A. in Hank, C. H. (2011). Classifying data quality problems. IDQ newsletter, 7(4), 3 str.

Graham, P. S. (1990). Quality in cataloguing: making distinctions. Journal of academic librarianship, 16(4), 213−218.

Hafter, R. (1986). Academic librarians and cataloging networks: visibility, quality control, and professional status. New York: Greenwood Press.

Harden, J. (2012). Inadvertent RDA: new catalogers’ errors in AARC2. Journal of library metadata, 12(2−3), 264−278.

Harmon, J. C. (1996). The death of quality cataloging: does it make a difference for library users?. Journal of academic librarianship, 22(4), 306−307.

Hider, P. in Tan, K. (2008). Constructing record quality measures based on catalog use. Cataloging and classification quarterly, 46(4), 338−361.

Intner, S. S. (1989). Much ado about nothing: OCLC and RLIN cataloguing quality. Library journal, 114(2), 38−40.

Izjava o mednarodnih katalogizacijskih načelih. (2009). Ljubljana: Narodna in univerzitetna knjižnica. Pridobljeno 12. 12. 2016 s spletne strani: http://old.nuk.uni-lj.si/infobib/images/stories/Dokumenti/Izjava_o_mednarodnih_katalogizacijskih_nacelih.pdf

Kavčič, I. (2012). Kakovost zapisov v vzajemni bibliografsko-kataložni bazi podatkov COBIB.SI. Knjižničarske novice, 22(6), str. 1−19.

Kavčič, I. in Velkavrh, V. (2009). Kakovost knjižničnih katalogov (bibliografskih baz podatkov). Knjižničarske novice, 19(11), 8−10.

Kim, W., Choi, B. J., Hong, E. K., Kim, S. K. in Lee, D. (2003). A taxonomy of dirty data. Data mining and knowledge discovery, 7(1), 81−99.

Kont, K. (2015). How much does it cost to catalog a document?: a case study in Estonian university libraries. Cataloging and classification quarterly, 53(7), 825−850.

Krstulović, Z. (2006). Katalogizacijska pravila in kakovost bibliografskih podatkov. Organizacija znanja, 11(4), 215−218.

Leckie, J. G., Given, L. in Campbell, G. (2009). Technologies of social regulation: an examination of library OPACs and web portals. V G. J. Leckie in J. E. Buschman (ur.), Information technology in librarianship: new critical approaches (str. 221−259). Wesport: Libraries Unlimited.

Likar, T. (2003). Enotna obdelava knjižničnega gradiva: pogoj za izmenjavo in skupno uporabo bibliografskih zapisov. Knjižnica, 47(1−2), 7−34.

Likar, T. in Žumer, M. (2004). Mnenja katalogizatorjev o modulu za katalogizacijo v sistemu COBISS. Knjižnica, 48(1−2), 83−122.

Lundy, M. W. (2006). Evidence of application of DCRB Core Standard in WorldCat and RLIN. Library resources and technical services, 50(1), 42−57.

Ma, F., Mo, Z. in Luo, Y. (2014). Empirical research on a model to measure end-user satisfaction with the quality of database search results. Journal of academic librarianship, 40(2), 194−201.

MacEwan, A. in Young, T. (2004). Quality vs. quantity: developing a systematic approach to a perennial problem. Catalogue and index, (152), 1–7.

Mai, J. E. (2013). The quality and qualities of information. JASIST, 64(4), 675−688.

Massey, O. (2000). Auditing catalogue quality by random sampling. Master’s dissertation. Loughborough: Centre for information management. Pridobljeno 12. 2. 2016 s spletne strani: http://users.ox.ac.uk/~bodl0842/dissertation/index.html

Miksa, S. D. (2007). Functional requirements for bibliographic records: understanding support of FRBR’s four user tasks in MARC-encoded bibliographic records. Bulletin of the Association for the Information Science and Technology, 33(6), 24−26.

Mitchell, E. in McCallum, C. (2012). Old data, new scheme: an exploration of metadata migration using expert-guided computational techniques. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 49(1), 1−10.

Moen, W. E., Miksa, S. D., Eklund, A., Polyakov, S. in Snyder, G. (2006). Learning from artifacts: metadata utilization analysis. V JCDL ‘06: proceedings of the 6th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on digital libraries (2 str.). New York: Association for Computing Machinery. Pridobljeno 12. 12. 2016 s spletne strani: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1141813

Moulaison Sandy, H. in Dykas, F. (2016). High-quality metadata and repository staffing: perceptions of United States-Based OpenDOAR participants. Cataloging and classification quarterly, 54(2), 101−116.

Moulaison, H. L. (2015). The expansion of the personal name authority record under Resource Description and Acess: current status and quality considerations. IFLA journal, 41(1), 13−24.

Myall, M. in Chambers, S. (2007). Copy cataloging for print and video monographs in two academic libraries: a case study of editing required for accuracy and completeness. Cataloging and classification quarterly, 44(3−4), 233−257.

Ochoa, X. in Duval, E. (2009). Automatic evaluation of metadata quality in digital repositories. International journal on digital libraries, 10(2−3), 67−91.

On the record: report of the Library of Congress Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control. (2008). Washington, D.C.: Library of Congress. Pridobljeno 12. 4. 2012 s spletne strani: http://www.loc.gov/bibliographic-future/news/lcwg-ontherecord-jan08-final.pdf

Paiste, M. S. (2003). Defining and achieving quality in cataloging in academic libraries: a literature review. Library collections, acquisitions and technical services, 27(3), 327–338.

Park, J. (2006). Semantic interoperability and metadata quality: an analysis of metadata item records of digital image collections. Knowledge organization, 33(1), 20−34.

Pesjak, D. in Petek, M. (2010). Kakovost bibliografskih zapisov v COBIB in uporaba katalogizacijskih priročnikov. Knjižnica, 54(3), 15–33.

Petek, M. (1998). Vrednotenje knjižničnih katalogov s stališča uporabnikov. Knjižnica, 42(4), 127−147.

Petek, M. (2012). Enotni naslov v teoriji in v slovensko-hrvaški katalogizacijski praksi. Knjižnica, 56(1−2), 127−148.

Petrucciani, A. (2015). Quality of library catalogs and value of (good) catalogs. Cataloging and classification quarterly, 53(3−4), 303−313.

Pisanski, J. in Žumer, M. (2009). Funkcionalne zahteve za bibliografske zapise (FZBZ): analiza uporabnosti konceptualnega modela bibliografskega sveta. Knjižnica, 53(1−2), str. 61−67.

Redman, T. C., Fox, C. in Levitin, A. (2009). Data and data quality. V Encyclopedia of library and information sciences (str. 1420−1431). New York: Taylor and Francis.

Rogina, A. (2007). Projekt Izboljšanje kakovosti zapisov v COBIB.SI. Organizacija znanja, 12(2), 58−67.

Romero, L. in Romero, N. (1992). Original cataloging in a decentralized environment: an identification and explanation of errors. Cataloging and classification quarterly, 15(4), 47−65.

Schultz-Jones, B., Snow, K., Miksa, S. in Hasenyager, R. L. (2012). Historical and current implications of cataloguing quality for next-generation catalogues. Library trends, 61(1), 49–82.

Seljak, M. (2000). Poti do konsistentnih katalogizacijskih pravil. Organizacija znanja, 5(4).

Seljak, M. (2006). Izvajanje določil pravilnika o izdaji dovoljenja za vzajemno katalogizacijo v sistemu COBISS.SI. Organizacija znanja, 11(4), 208–214.

Seljak, M., Brešar, T., Curk, L., Zalokar, M., Tominac, A., Mazić, G., ... Urbajs, A. (2004). Vzpostavitev normativne kontrole v knjižničnem informacijskem sistemu COBISS.SI, Slovenija. Organizacija znanja, 9(2), 37–46.

Shin, H. (2003). Quality of Korean cataloging records in shared databases. Cataloging and classification quarterly, 36(1), 55–90.

Smith-Yoshimura, K., Argus, C., Dickey, T. J., Naun, C. C., Rowlison de Ortiz, L. in Taylor, H. (2010). Implication of MARC tag usage on library metadata practices. Ohio: OCLC. Pridobljeno 12. 12. 2016 s spletne strani: http://www.oclc.org/content/dam/research/publications/library/2010/2010-06.pdf

Snow, K. (2011). A study of the perception of cataloging quality among catalogers in academic libraries. Dissertation. Denton, Texas: University of North Texas Libraries. Pridobljeno 12. 12. 2016 s spletne strani: https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc103394/m2/1/high_res_d/dissertation.pdf

Stalberg, E. in Cronin, C. (2011). Assessing the cost and value of bibliographic control. Library resources and technical services, 55(3), 124−137.

Statement of international cataloging principles (ICP). (2016). Haag: IFLA. Pridobljeno 23. 12. 2016 s spletne strani: http://www.ifla.org/publications/node/11015

Stvilia, B. in Gasser, L. (2008). Value-based metadata quality assessment. Library and information science research, 30(1), 67−74.

Stvilia, B., Gasser, L., Twidale, M. B. in Smith, L. C. (2007). A framework for information quality assessment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(12), 1720−1733.

Švab, K. in Žumer, M. (2016). Izbira leposlovja – še vedno izziv za knjižnice?: kriteriji, ki so pomembni za uporabnike. Knjižnica, 60(2−3), 127–149.

Tani, A., Candela, L. in Castelli, D. (2013). Dealing with medatada quality: the legacy of digital library efforts. Information processing and managament, 49(6), 1194−1205.

Taniguchi, S. (2005). Recording evidence in bibliographic records and descriptive metadata. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(8), 872−882.

Taniguchi, S. (2007). A system supporting evidence recording in bibliographic records. Part II: What is valuable evidence for catalogers?. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(6), 823−841.

Tenopir, C. (1990). Database quality revisited. Library journal, 115(16), 64−67.

Thomas, S. E. (1996). Quality in bibliographic control. Library trends, 44(3), 491−505.

Transforming our bibliographic framework: a statement from the Library of Congress. (2011, 13. maj). Washington, D.C.: Library of Congress. Pridobljeno 12. 4. 2012 s spletne strani: http://www.loc.gov/marc/transition/news/framework-051311.html

Urbajs, A. in Šobot, P. (1991). Vidiki kvalitete vzajemne in lokalnih baz v sistemu vzajemne katalogizacije. V T. M. Šercar (ur.), Tretiranje znanstvenih in strokovnih publikacij in polpublikacij v online dostopnih bazah podatkov za znanost in tehnologijo, 14. posvetovanje o znanstvenih in strokovnih publikacijah in polpublikacijah, Maribor, 16.–18. 12. 1991 (str. 269–273). Maribor: Univerza, Institut informacijskih znanosti.

Van Kleeck, D., Langford, G., Lundgren, J., Nakano, H., O’Dell, A. J. in Shelton, T. (2016). Managing bibliographic data quality in a consortial academic library: a case study. Cataloging and classification quarterly, 54(7), 452−467.

Vetrò, A., Canova, L., Torchiano, M., Orozco Minotas, C., Iemma, R. in Morando, F. (2016). Open data quality measurement framework: definition and application to open governement data. Government information quarterly, 33(2), 325–337.

Wang, R. Y. in Strong, D. M. (1996). Beyond accuracy: what data quality means to data consumers. Journal of management information systems, 12(4), 5−33.

Wisser, K. M. (2014). The errors of our ways: using metadata quality research to understand common error patterns in the application of name headings. V S. Closs idr. (ur.), Metadata and semantics research. MTSR 2014 (str. 83−94). Cham: Springer.

Yang, S. in Li, L. (2015). Emerging technologies for librarians: a practical approach to innovation. Amstardam: Chandos.

Yasser, C. M. (2011). An analysis of problems in metadata records. Journal of library metadata, 11(2), 51−62.

Zalokar, M. (2006). Razvoj splošnega geslovnika COBISS.SI. Organizacija znanja, 11(4), 224−229.

Zeng, M. in Qin, J. (2008). Metadata. London: Facet.

Zhang, Y. in Salaba, A. (2012). What do users tell us about FRBF-based catalogs?. Cataloging and classification quarterly, 50(5−7), 705−723.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.